
About the book: What is God like? A punishing judge? A doting grandfather? A deadbeat dad? A vengeful warrior?
Believers
and atheists alike typically carry and finally reject the toxic images
of God in their own hearts and minds. Even the Christian gospel has
repeatedly lapsed into a vision of God where the wrathful King must be
appeased by his victim Son. How do such good cop/bad cop distortions of
the divine arise and come to dominate churches and cultures?
Whether
our notions of 'god' are personal projections or inherited traditions,
author and theologian Brad Jersak proposes a radical reassessment,
arguing for A More Christlike God: a More Beautiful Gospel. If
Christ is "the image of the invisible God, the radiance of God's glory
and exact representation of God's likeness," what if we conceived of God
as completely Christlike---the perfect Incarnation of self-giving,
radically forgiving, co-suffering love? What if God has always been and
forever will be cruciform (cross-shaped) in his character and actions?
A More Christlike God
suggests that such a God would be very good news indeed---a God who
Jesus "unwrathed" from dead religion, a Love that is always toward us,
and a Grace that pours into this suffering world through willing, human
partners.
My Thoughts: It took me awhile to get through this book, and I'm still pondering parts of it. I appreciated a lot of Jersak's thoughts, but many of his points left me unsettled, uneasy, and frankly, unconvinced.
Jersak's assertion that we can know everything there is to know about God from the life of Jesus is, in itself, suspect. Yes, Jesus is the perfect representation of God, but not everything He said or did is recorded in the gospels. If that was all we needed to know, why do have the epistles, or the entire OT for that matter? God has revealed himself in the entire Bible, not just select books.
In order to dewrath God, Jersak does two things. First he interprets wrath to be passive - the natural consequences of our sin is it's own punishment. To a certain extent, this is very true, but leaves many questions unanswered. Second, he interprets all mention of God's active wrath as either misunderstood, figurative, or ironic. He does not give satisfactory explanations to the portions of scripture he tries to tackle, and seems to simply take a scissor to other passages from both the OT and the NT, including even the words and actions of Jesus. (Jesus clearing out the temple strikes me as wrathful, for example). At time he implies that the writers of the OT were misinterpreting things or confused - which is impossible, since all scripture is God-breathed. And, at times, seems to take a snide tone when he talks about anyone disagreeing with his obvious conclusions.
I agree that no matter what we do God is always turned toward us, continuing to offer us grace. I disagree with him though, that the offer never ends. He doesn't outrightly say it, but it is implied that he believes eventually everyone is saved and no one is in hell.
I agree that who God
actually is, is independant of who we
think He is.
Yet, at the same time, I think he has tried to put God in a box, and He doesn't quite fit.
I would not recommend this book. Instead, I would highly recommend one called
The Most Encouraging Book on Hell Ever
Thank you to Litfuse Publicity for organizing
this tour and providing me with my complimentary review copy.